【摘錄】claim construction -- indefiniteness

【摘錄】claim construction -- indefiniteness

An analysis of claim indefiniteness under §112 P2 is "inextricably intertwined with
claim construction.

法條§112 P2的申請專利範圍的不明確分析與申請專利範圍的解譯，水乳交融不可分離。

In Exxon Research & Engineering, 265 F.3d at 1375, the court stated that "if the meaning of the claim is discernible, even though the task may be formidable and the conclusion may be one over which reasonable persons will disagree, we have held the claim sufficiently clear to avoid invalidity on indefiniteness grounds."

如果申請專利範圍是可識別的，即使任務難以應付，且結論也許與能判斷事理之人的意見不合，我們判決該申請專利範圍足夠清楚明白，可避免依不明確理由的無效性。

想法：第二句一開始覺得邏輯怪怪的，原因在於「the conclusion may be one over which reasonable persons will disagree」，這整句的邏輯對嗎？

參見：justpatent

PS：今天比較認真一點翻個兩句吧。